A link in Rhe Dizzies homepage opposite led me to this:
site.xavier.edu/polt/keeler/story.html
Can this really be possible? Is it the sort of elaborate hoax that the Net invites and obsessed over-stimulated and highly intelligent college students create? It has to be real; follow the links and you get an actual novel, published by McSweeneys -- but then again McSweeneys is a doubtful enterprise and seems itself somehow impossible even when yhou hold its products in your hands.
Ramblehouse has reprinted a lot of this
http://www.ramblehouse.com/HarryKee
http://www.letraslibres.com/blog/bl
in April, I thought it was some sort of joke or hoax too. Especially the affirmation that his last loyal publishers were in Madrid, during the time of Franco's dictatorship; I mean, we're talking about the last fascist dictatorship here. But then Letras Libres is one of the most important literary magazines in the Spanish-speaking world.
I have a very large to-read stack, so I can't give a summary, sorry.
Keeler
He's also, as the Keeler Society page has indicated, attracted a lot of dedicated fans--I think people are drawn to him simply because he seems to be sui generis, his oeuvre seeming to be utterly independent of any influence or school.
If you want a recommendation of where to start, the Keeler Society folks would I'm sure be glad to give you one.
Or conversely, like an internet fic writer who never found a 'beta reader.'
http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDet
Keeler
i've always wanted to try to write something using his formula for creating plots (very OuLiPo)--there's a pdf IIRC kicking around the internet somewhere--
No, life can invent weirder writers than anything writers can come up with.
m.
Re: Keeler
http://www.spinelessbooks.com/keeler/me
(there seems to be an automated version at the Keeler society website.)
m.
Re: Keeler
Scholars have recently suggested that in the original Greek text, John's number of the beast was actually something like 616, which seems just plain silly.
616? I guess by now 666 must have been so thoroughly explained that even if the original manuscript of "The Revelation" were to be produced and proved to say 616 it would only show that even guys like John (the one of Patmos) are not above misspelling.
The 616 version apparently turned up relatively recently in a fragment that is the earliest known surviving copy of the passage containing the reference.