?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

New query



[That poem in the previous was from a collection called Poems of our Moment.]


Here's a question raised in my mind, but an old one actually, by the Mad Astronaut story.

If you are jilted/cheated on/losing your lover to another, do you in you blind rage and grief want to shoot/pepper spray/mallet:

a) your lover,

b) the lover's new or alternative lover,

or

c) both, but if so, which more?

Comments

( 35 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
ruthling
Feb. 11th, 2007 07:45 pm (UTC)
d) myself?

I'd say the new lover, because I would blame them for what was really an issue between my lover and myself.
womzilla
Feb. 19th, 2007 02:59 am (UTC)
"Don't laugh--you're next!"
liveavatar
Feb. 11th, 2007 07:55 pm (UTC)
It depends on the context. What's the arrangement between me and my lover? Is my lover a slimeball who professed eternal, singular love to me while sneaking out the back door? That'll be his skull in my hands (as shown in the icon).

Did the other person know my lover was involved, supposedly solely with me, and deliberately insinuate herself between us? I will make that person's life a living hell. However, if she didn't know I existed, no fault to her side.

If prearrangements have been made (we're poly, we're already broken up, we didn't promise exclusivity), no pepper spray for anyone. Some party invitations might be torn up.

Without any other context, the person I machine-gun first would be my lover.
(Deleted comment)
dream__boat
Feb. 11th, 2007 09:24 pm (UTC)
c) both,
but my lover's new lover more. i certainly feel that it's easier to hate a person you're not in love with, especially when he or she is aware of your situation and fully understands that his/ her actions will hurt you. i think psycologically it takes some of the anger and blame off the lover gone astray and it's a kind of self-defense mechanism in regard to the relationship.
bevhale
Feb. 11th, 2007 10:03 pm (UTC)
I'd want to go after the lover, but I'd probably just remove them from my universe mentally. Of course, if the fates decided to balance the rat bastard's karma, I'd like to be there to watch...and laugh. Or I might write a story in which they figure as a victim. All the satisfaction, none of the prison time.
liveavatar
Feb. 11th, 2007 11:40 pm (UTC)
Yeah, cutting people out of my head is what I do in real life, as opposed to my revenge fantasies described above. No relationship woes are worth driving 900 miles in diapers, much less standing in a courtroom (as a defendant, anyway).
(no subject) - bevhale - Feb. 12th, 2007 12:29 am (UTC) - Expand
tomsdisch
Feb. 11th, 2007 10:43 pm (UTC)
If I caught them at it
No, not even then. I thought the astronaut was out of her orbit, and I'd certainly give preference to the false lover, not my rival. But that isn't why guys get into fights in bars, is it? They go after rivals. Likewise Mercedes McCambridge and John Crawford, or was it Barbara Stanwyck in Johnny Guitar. The locus classicus, or would it be Aida, for female/female deadly intent. But really I'm not like that./ I once had a heart to heart talk with my lover's wife and his new lover (woman) and we all discussed what a lovely fellow he was. That was in Feb. of 68. Things were different then. We all loved each other.
vakratunda
Feb. 12th, 2007 06:24 am (UTC)
Guys Get Into Fights In Bars
Because they like fighting.

There's usually other stuff going on, but there's always that.





.
chatgoddess
Feb. 12th, 2007 01:30 am (UTC)
Both, but the new lover more. I think it's because I wouldn't have any pre-existing loving feelings towards them (unless it was someone I knew) and I'd be more willing to forgive the person I was already in a relationship with.

I realize it doesn't make sense, but feelings are often irrational.
boxofdelights
Feb. 12th, 2007 01:42 am (UTC)
I don't see how anyone could answer this question without knowing the details. What ties of love and loyalty connected you and your lover? What promises? What relationship did you have with your lover's lover? Was either of them cruel to you? How cruel? Did either of them deceive you? How?

The only time anything like this happened to me, my friend told me that we were living the oldest story in the book; but it seems to me that the details of our story are so odd that it becomes a different story. It makes a difference that my husband's lover had been my dearest friend for thirty-seven years before she became his lover (and for fourteen years before I became his lover); that I consented to their relationship; that I loved her and believed she loved me. It matters that it was my friend, and only my friend, who insisted that my husband no longer loved me. It matters that the falsehoods he told me were lies, while the ones she told me were, apparently, delusions, which, she said, she believed because she needed to. It matters that his falsehoods were meant (among other things) to protect me from pain and to prevent my leaving him, while hers were meant to cause pain and to drive me away from them both.

If any of those details were different, so would be how angry I am at each of them, and what I wish I could do about that anger.
snidegrrl
Feb. 12th, 2007 03:54 am (UTC)
I have to say that if I could generalize this to any losing-my-lover situation, if any violence is inspired by it, it would be (would have been, because I don't think about things that way so much nowadays) to myself. So I have to say d) also.
slithytove
Feb. 12th, 2007 04:31 am (UTC)
It depends on how old you are.

If you are young, you shoot your lover. You are taking revenge for her perfidy, which is a personal insult against you, your manhood, your love-making abilities, whatever. Their new lover was merely the instrument. Maybe you go out and have a beer with him, and grouse about how them dames are all alike.

If you are old, you shoot your lover's new lover. Because 'love' is as temporary, contingent, and mutable as any other sublunary thing, all lovers may be unfaithful, it probably wasn't an insult anyway, and even if it was, responding to an insult is a silly waste of time. Instead, you shoot your lover's new lover, as a practical matter, reducing the pool of rivals by one.
vakratunda
Feb. 12th, 2007 06:21 am (UTC)
The Question Shows Such A Lack Of Imagination
Why not

c) several random strangers you pick off with a sniper rifle from a tall building.

d) The President of the United States <=(Note for US Secret Service: this is a joke).

e) several prostitutes you pick up in red light districts over a period of years.

f) an oboist.

g) everyone at your workplace after taking them hostage.

etc.

The possibilities are endless.

I mean you want everyone to know how upset you are, right?





.









.
(Anonymous)
Feb. 12th, 2007 06:40 am (UTC)
My initial reaction was neither, at least as regards the notion of commiting some sort of mayhem. But as far as wanting to rail against one, the other, or both is concerned, it would really depend on the details of the situation. For instance, is the new (or alternate) lover a stranger, or a trusted friend? That alone would make a world of difference.

stm
bookzombie
Feb. 12th, 2007 09:38 am (UTC)
Well, if you're going to go to all that trouble, you might as well do both. As well to be hung for a sheep as a lamb (as they say around here)!
vakratunda
Feb. 12th, 2007 03:56 pm (UTC)
And Why Stop There?
I ask you.


.
(Anonymous)
Feb. 12th, 2007 11:49 am (UTC)
I'd befriend the new lover, then seduce him/her.

This nearly always works, plus there's no jailtime. Unless someone then decides to kill ME.
peregrin8
Feb. 12th, 2007 02:30 pm (UTC)
The only way I'm going to be mad at either of them is if my lover lied to me -- otherwise I'm just sad (or mad at myself) -- or, more likely in my case, hoping to meet and adore my lover's other lover as well.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
( 35 comments — Leave a comment )